Screener
FLJP vs SCJ
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- FLJP costs 0.41% less per year.
- FLJP is significantly larger than SCJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FLJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLJP | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.5B | $235M |
| Since | 2017 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.66% | 2.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.3% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.6% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.13% | 16.10% |
| Max drawdown | -32.49% | -37.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLJP and SCJ
Explore further