Screener
FLQL vs OMFL
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FLQL costs 0.14% less per year.
- FLQL is classified as equity, while OMFL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FLQL follows a index tracking strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- Over the last 3 years, FLQL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLQL | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $4.6B |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | 0.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.4% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.8% | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.99% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -33.64% | -33.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLQL and OMFL
Explore further