Screener
OMFL vs FLQM
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF
Key differences
- OMFL is classified as alternative, while FLQM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; FLQM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, OMFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | FLQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.6B | $1.6B |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 1.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.5% | +7.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.3% | +11.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.4% | +7.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 12.36% |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -37.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFL and FLQM
Explore further