Screener
FLQM vs OMFS
Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FLQM costs 0.09% less per year.
- FLQM is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLQM follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, OMFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLQM | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $275M |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.51% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.8% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.6% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.36% | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -37.26% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLQM and OMFS
Explore further