Screener
OMFS vs FLQL
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF
Key differences
- FLQL costs 0.24% less per year.
- FLQL is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; FLQL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FLQL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFS | FLQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $275M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 1.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.6% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.4% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.2% | +14.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.63% | 12.99% |
| Max drawdown | -42.50% | -33.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFS and FLQL
Explore further