Screener
FLTW vs FXP
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF vs ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
Key differences
- FLTW costs 0.76% less per year.
- FLTW is significantly larger than FXP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLTW covers asia pacific markets; FXP covers emerging markets.
- FLTW follows a index tracking strategy; FXP uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, FLTW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FXP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLTW | FXP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $6M |
| Since | 2017 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.82% | 4.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +113.3% | -4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +42.9% | -29.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.7% | -17.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | -0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.76% | 38.91% |
| Max drawdown | -38.00% | -94.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLTW and FXP
Explore further