Screener
FLV vs XTAP
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF vs Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF – April
Key differences
- FLV costs 0.37% less per year.
- FLV is significantly larger than XTAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLV is classified as equity, while XTAP is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FLV follows a active selection strategy; XTAP uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, XTAP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLV | XTAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.42% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $347M | $22M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.8% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.4% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.08% | 4.89% |
| Max drawdown | -15.06% | -22.13% |
Similar to FLV and XTAP
Explore further