Screener
FMF vs FAAR
First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund vs First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
Key differences
- FMF follows a managed futures strategy; FAAR uses long short.
- Over the last 3 years, FAAR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMF | FAAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $266M | $168M |
| Since | 2013 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 5.00% | 9.07% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | managed futures | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.0% | +41.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.9% | +12.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.41 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.65% | 13.44% |
| Max drawdown | -16.89% | -18.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMF and FAAR
Explore further