Screener
FNDA vs FFSM
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF vs Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- FNDA follows a index tracking strategy; FFSM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FFSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDA | FFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.2B | — |
| Since | 2013 | — |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +37.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.24% | 17.99% |
| Max drawdown | -44.64% | -26.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDA and FFSM
Explore further