Screener
FNDF vs IWD
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWD costs 0.07% less per year.
- IWD is significantly larger than FNDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNDF covers global ex us markets; IWD covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, FNDF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDF | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $23.1B | $74.3B |
| Since | 2013 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 3.01% | 1.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.2% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.0% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.4% | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.03% | 10.88% |
| Max drawdown | -40.14% | -38.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDF and IWD
Explore further