Screener
IWD vs FNDC
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
Key differences
- IWD costs 0.21% less per year.
- IWD is significantly larger than FNDC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWD | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $74.3B | $3.3B |
| Since | 2000 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.55% | 3.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +31.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.88% | 14.24% |
| Max drawdown | -38.51% | -43.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWD and FNDC
Explore further