Screener
FNDF vs REVS
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
Key differences
- REVS costs 0.06% less per year.
- FNDF is significantly larger than REVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNDF covers global ex us markets; REVS covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, FNDF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FNDF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDF | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $23.1B | $284M |
| Since | 2013 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 3.01% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.9% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.4% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.9% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.12% | 11.62% |
| Max drawdown | -40.14% | -37.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDF and REVS
Explore further