Screener
FORH vs BCEM
Formidable ETF vs Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF
Key differences
- FORH is classified as alternative, while BCEM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; BCEM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | BCEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | — |
| Since | 2021 | — |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -6.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and BCEM
Explore further