Screener
FORH vs EMOP
Formidable ETF vs AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- EMOP costs 0.49% less per year.
- EMOP is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH is classified as alternative, while EMOP is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; EMOP uses active selection.
- EMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | EMOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2021 | 1995 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 1.64% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -12.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and EMOP
Explore further