Screener
FORH vs CTA
Formidable ETF vs Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- CTA costs 0.44% less per year.
- CTA is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; CTA uses systematic alpha.
- Over the last 3 years, CTA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | CTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 4.03% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 19.72% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -18.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and CTA
Explore further