Screener
FORH vs IMF
Formidable ETF vs Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- IMF costs 0.54% less per year.
- IMF is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; IMF uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | IMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $301M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -15.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and IMF
Explore further