Screener
FORH vs ISMF
Formidable ETF vs iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
Key differences
- ISMF costs 0.39% less per year.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; ISMF uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | ISMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $57M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 2.50% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | option income | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 7.87% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -4.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and ISMF
Explore further