Screener
FORH vs FBCG
Formidable ETF vs Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- FBCG costs 0.62% less per year.
- FBCG is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH is classified as alternative, while FBCG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; FBCG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FBCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | FBCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $6.2B |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.04% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.4% | +42.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.0% | +16.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.64% | 18.65% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -43.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and FBCG
Explore further