Screener
FORH vs FFND
Formidable ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
- FFND costs 0.19% less per year.
- FFND is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH is classified as alternative, while FFND is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; FFND uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $99M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +23.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +23.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -47.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and FFND
Explore further