Screener
FPWR vs PIPE
First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF vs Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- FPWR follows a index tracking strategy; PIPE uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FPWR | PIPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $64M |
| Since | — | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.7% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 14.18% |
| Max drawdown | -32.28% | -15.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FPWR and PIPE
Explore further