Screener
FPX vs FDRS
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.08% less per year.
- FPX is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FPX is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FPX follows a index tracking strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
- FPX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FPX | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $77M |
| Since | 2006 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +33.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.27% | — |
| Max drawdown | -43.14% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FPX and FDRS
Explore further