Screener
GQQQ vs PSET
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF vs Principal Quality ETF
Key differences
- PSET costs 0.20% less per year.
- GQQQ is significantly larger than PSET — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GQQQ follows a active selection strategy; PSET uses index tracking.
- PSET has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GQQQ | PSET | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $130M | $33M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 0.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.2% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 12.80% |
| Max drawdown | -22.36% | -34.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GQQQ and PSET
Explore further