Screener
FRNW vs CCNR
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF vs ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- FRNW follows a index tracking strategy; CCNR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FRNW | CCNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $141M | $394M |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | 2.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +84.9% | +72.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.62% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -59.37% | -20.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FRNW and CCNR
Explore further