Screener
FRNW vs SMOG
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF vs VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
Key differences
- FRNW costs 0.25% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, SMOG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FRNW | SMOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $141M | $152M |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +84.9% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.2% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.62% | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -59.37% | -51.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FRNW and SMOG
Explore further