Screener
FRWD vs AAXJ
Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both FRWD and AAXJ are equity ETFs. FRWD charges 0.65% a year and AAXJ 0.72%. The main difference: FRWD follows a active selection strategy; AAXJ uses index tracking.
- FRWD follows a active selection strategy; AAXJ uses index tracking.
- FRWD costs 0.07% less per year.
- AAXJ is much larger than FRWD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FRWD | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $4.0B |
| Since | 2026 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.53% |
| Max drawdown | -18.49% | -44.52% |
Similar to FRWD and AAXJ
Explore further