Screener
FRWD vs IPAC
Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both FRWD and IPAC are equity ETFs. FRWD charges 0.65% a year and IPAC 0.09%. The main difference: FRWD follows a active selection strategy; IPAC uses index tracking.
- FRWD follows a active selection strategy; IPAC uses index tracking.
- IPAC costs 0.56% less per year.
- IPAC is much larger than FRWD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IPAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FRWD | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2026 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.74% |
| Max drawdown | -18.49% | -31.00% |
Similar to FRWD and IPAC
Explore further