Screener
FRWD vs EEMA
Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
Both FRWD and EEMA are equity ETFs. FRWD charges 0.65% a year and EEMA 0.49%. The main difference: FRWD follows a active selection strategy; EEMA uses index tracking.
- FRWD follows a active selection strategy; EEMA uses index tracking.
- EEMA costs 0.16% less per year.
- EEMA is much larger than FRWD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FRWD | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2026 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +43.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.37% |
| Max drawdown | -18.49% | -44.18% |
Similar to FRWD and EEMA
Explore further