Screener
FSGS vs TMFM
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF vs Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
Both FSGS and TMFM are equity ETFs. FSGS charges 0.61% a year and TMFM 0.85%. The main difference: FSGS follows a index tracking strategy; TMFM uses active selection.
- FSGS follows a index tracking strategy; TMFM uses active selection.
- FSGS costs 0.24% less per year.
- TMFM is much larger than FSGS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, FSGS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FSGS | TMFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $117M |
| Since | 2017 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | -19.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.4% | +3.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 0.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.31% | 18.84% |
| Max drawdown | -43.25% | -31.75% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.