Screener
FSGS vs TMFS
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF vs Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
Both FSGS and TMFS are equity ETFs. FSGS charges 0.61% a year and TMFS 0.85%. The main difference: FSGS follows a index tracking strategy; TMFS uses active selection.
- FSGS follows a index tracking strategy; TMFS uses active selection.
- FSGS costs 0.24% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| FSGS | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $59M |
| Since | 2017 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | -0.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.4% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | -1.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.31% | 19.89% |
| Max drawdown | -43.25% | -48.79% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.