Screener
FTXR vs MOTO
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
Key differences
- FTXR costs 0.08% less per year.
- FTXR is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FTXR follows a index tracking strategy; MOTO uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FTXR | MOTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $934M | $10M |
| Since | 2016 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.22% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.3% | +56.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.01% | 21.11% |
| Max drawdown | -52.06% | -38.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FTXR and MOTO
Explore further