Screener
FVAL vs GLOF
Fidelity Value Factor ETF vs iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- FVAL costs 0.05% less per year.
- FVAL is significantly larger than GLOF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GLOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FVAL | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $196M |
| Since | 2016 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 1.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.4% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.74% | 12.58% |
| Max drawdown | -37.26% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FVAL and GLOF
Explore further