Screener
FXP vs UPV
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 vs ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
Key differences
- FXP follows a inverse strategy; UPV uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, UPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FXP | UPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $14M |
| Since | 2007 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 4.39% | 2.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.4% | +34.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -29.4% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -17.7% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.40 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.91% | 30.82% |
| Max drawdown | -94.71% | -67.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FXP and UPV
Explore further