Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

UPV vs XPP

ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe vs ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50

UPV

ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$14M

XPP

ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$11M

Key differences

  • UPV is classified as equity, while XPP is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
  • Over the last 3 years, UPV has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

UPVXPP
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$14M$11M
Since20102009
Dividend yield2.14%2.43%
Asset classequitycryptocurrency
Region
Strategyleveragedleveraged
CAGR 1Y+34.9%-8.4%
CAGR 3Y+23.2%+5.4%
CAGR 5Y+9.8%-19.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.710.31
Volatility 1Y30.82%38.82%
Max drawdown-67.25%-89.90%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to UPV and XPP