Screener
FXP vs YINN
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 vs Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- FXP costs 0.39% less per year.
- YINN is significantly larger than FXP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FXP is classified as equity, while YINN is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
- FXP follows a inverse strategy; YINN uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, YINN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FXP | YINN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 1.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $766M |
| Since | 2007 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.39% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | cryptocurrency |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.4% | -19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | -29.4% | -5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -17.7% | -37.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.40 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.91% | 58.22% |
| Max drawdown | -94.71% | -98.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FXP and YINN
Explore further