Screener
YINN vs XPP
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares vs ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
Key differences
- XPP costs 0.39% less per year.
- YINN is significantly larger than XPP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XPP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| YINN | XPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.34% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $766M | $11M |
| Since | 2009 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 2.43% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | cryptocurrency |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.0% | -8.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -5.5% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -37.5% | -19.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 58.22% | 38.82% |
| Max drawdown | -98.59% | -89.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YINN and XPP
Explore further