Screener
GAA vs ENDW
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF vs Cambria Endowment Style ETF
Key differences
- ENDW costs 0.18% less per year.
- GAA is classified as mixed asset, while ENDW is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GAA follows a active selection strategy; ENDW uses multi strategy.
- GAA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAA | ENDW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $69M | $139M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.62% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.1% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.11% | 10.19% |
| Max drawdown | -26.57% | -6.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAA and ENDW
Explore further