Screener
GAL vs RHTX
State Street Global Allocation ETF vs RH Tactical Outlook ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 1.16% less per year.
- GAL is significantly larger than RHTX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GAL is classified as alternative, while RHTX is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- GAL follows a tactical allocation strategy; RHTX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RHTX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAL | RHTX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 1.51% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $307M | $9M |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.71% | 15.10% |
| Max drawdown | -28.31% | -24.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAL and RHTX
Explore further