Screener
GAL vs RHRX
State Street Global Allocation ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 1.03% less per year.
- GAL is significantly larger than RHRX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GAL follows a tactical allocation strategy; RHRX uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, RHRX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAL | RHRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 1.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $307M | $34M |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.71% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -28.31% | -25.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAL and RHRX
Explore further