Screener
GAL vs XFLX
State Street Global Allocation ETF vs FundX Flexible ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 0.62% less per year.
- GAL is significantly larger than XFLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GAL is classified as alternative, while XFLX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GAL follows a tactical allocation strategy; XFLX uses active selection.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAL | XFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $307M | $49M |
| Since | 2012 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | 9.73% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.1% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.75% | 3.53% |
| Max drawdown | -28.31% | -6.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAL and XFLX
Explore further