Screener
GAL vs XCOR
State Street Global Allocation ETF vs Fundx ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 0.80% less per year.
- GAL is classified as alternative, while XCOR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GAL follows a tactical allocation strategy; XCOR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, XCOR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAL | XCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 1.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $307M | $180M |
| Since | 2012 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | 0.41% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.1% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | +23.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.75% | 12.91% |
| Max drawdown | -28.31% | -22.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAL and XCOR
Explore further