Screener
GAL vs XNAV
State Street Global Allocation ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 0.92% less per year.
- GAL is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GAL follows a tactical allocation strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAL | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $307M | $31M |
| Since | 2012 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.1% | +44.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.75% | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -28.31% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAL and XNAV
Explore further