Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GAMR vs METV

Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF

GAMR

Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF

Amplify ETFs

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$37M

METV

Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF

Roundhill Investments

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$232M

Key differences

  • METV is significantly larger than GAMR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, METV has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • GAMR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GAMRMETV
Annual cost (TER)0.59%0.59%
Fund size (AUM)$37M$232M
Since20162021
Dividend yield0.57%0.19%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+20.8%+24.1%
CAGR 3Y+14.9%+26.5%
CAGR 5Y+0.2%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.560.95
Volatility 1Y22.42%23.94%
Max drawdown-54.16%-59.64%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to GAMR and METV