Screener
GBUG vs RING
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- RING costs 0.51% less per year.
- RING is significantly larger than GBUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GBUG follows a active selection strategy; RING uses index tracking.
- RING has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GBUG | RING | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $164M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.55% | 0.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +74.3% | +77.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +46.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +19.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 47.45% | 46.02% |
| Max drawdown | -32.10% | -52.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GBUG and RING
Explore further