Screener
GDMA vs FMF
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Key differences
Both GDMA and FMF are alternative ETFs. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and FMF 0.98%. The main difference: GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; FMF uses managed futures.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; FMF uses managed futures.
- GDMA costs 0.23% less per year.
- Over the last three years, GDMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | FMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $260M |
| Since | 2018 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 5.01% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | +4.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 9.73% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -16.89% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.