Screener
MKAM vs CCOR
Mkam Etf vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
Both MKAM and CCOR are alternative ETFs. MKAM charges 0.53% a year and CCOR 1.29%. The main difference: MKAM follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- MKAM follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- MKAM costs 0.76% less per year.
- Over the last three years, MKAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MKAM | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $27M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.90% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.6% | -3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | -1.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.19% | 7.21% |
| Max drawdown | -5.01% | -22.99% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.