Screener
GDMA vs XFLX
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs FundX Flexible ETF
Key differences
GDMA is an alternative ETF, while XFLX is a fixed income ETF. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and XFLX 0.97%.
- GDMA is an alternative fund, while XFLX is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; XFLX uses active selection.
- GDMA costs 0.22% less per year.
- GDMA is much larger than XFLX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | XFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $50M |
| Since | 2018 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 9.67% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 3.62% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -6.54% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.