Screener
GDMA vs XRLX
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs FundX Conservative ETF
Key differences
GDMA is an alternative ETF, while XRLX is a fixed income ETF. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and XRLX 1.20%.
- GDMA is an alternative fund, while XRLX is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; XRLX uses active selection.
- GDMA costs 0.45% less per year.
- GDMA is much larger than XRLX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | XRLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 1.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $52M |
| Since | 2018 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 2.57% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 8.59% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -15.34% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.