Screener
GDXJ vs GPZ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF vs VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 0.12% less per year.
- GDXJ is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDXJ | GPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.7B | $245M |
| Since | 2009 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +78.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +45.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.67% | — |
| Max drawdown | -57.78% | -31.72% |
Similar to GDXJ and GPZ
Explore further