Screener
GDXJ vs LFEQ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF vs VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
Key differences
- GDXJ costs 0.06% less per year.
- GDXJ is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDXJ is classified as equity, while LFEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GDXJ follows a index tracking strategy; LFEQ uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, GDXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GDXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDXJ | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.7B | $29M |
| Since | 2009 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +78.1% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +45.9% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.1% | +10.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.67% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -57.78% | -35.19% |
Similar to GDXJ and LFEQ
Explore further