Screener
GEM vs GSID
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSID costs 0.15% less per year.
- GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; GSID uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEM | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 2.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.2% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 15.16% |
| Max drawdown | -37.02% | -29.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEM and GSID
Explore further